WeArrange
Jurisdictions Compare About
Begin

Employment & HR

Employee or contractor — how the line is actually drawn

The invoice does not decide it. Direction, exclusivity and control do, and if the substance is employment then gratuity, notice and leave apply for the whole period retrospectively.

Substance over formRetrospective exposurePermit the first test

The entitlement

What the law gives, regardless of contract.

A contractor is an independent business supplying services under a commercial contract. An employee works under the direction and control of an employer, typically to set hours, using the employer's systems, with no other clients and no business of their own. The distinction matters because employment brings the whole statutory apparatus: work permit, registered contract, WPS, health insurance, annual leave, sick leave, notice and end-of-service gratuity. A contractor relationship brings none of it.

The first test is simply whether the individual holds a permit or licence covering the work. Without one, the arrangement is not a contractor relationship at all — it is unlicensed work, and the engaging company carries the exposure. Where a permit does exist, the substance still matters. A person working exclusively for one company under its direction, on its premises, to its hours, is in substance an employee, and if the relationship ends badly they will say so at MOHRE. The exposure is retrospective: gratuity, notice and accrued leave for the entire period, none of which was budgeted or provided for.

The numbers

First test
Does the individual hold a permit or licence for this work
Substance factors
Direction, control, exclusivity, hours, premises, other clients
If reclassified
Gratuity, notice and leave for the whole engagement
Exposure
On the engaging company
Corporate tax
Payments to connected persons must be arm's length
Safer alternative
A part-time or temporary work permit

What it costs

Gratuity for the whole engagement40%Payable if the relationship is reclassified
Notice pay20%As though they had always been an employee
Accrued leave20%For the entire period, never tracked
Permit penalties20%For employing without a permit

Proportions indicative — they shift with visa count, premises and activity.

What a reclassification actually costs. None of it was budgeted, and it is assessed retrospectively.

In practice

How this is actually administered.

  1. Verify the permit or licence covers the activityAnd keep a copy. A promise that one exists is not a defence.
  2. Structure genuinely commercial engagements commerciallyDeliverables rather than hours, their own tools where practical, freedom to work for others.
  3. Avoid the markers of employmentFixed hours, a desk, a company email address, line management, exclusivity over a long period.
  4. Contract properly, including IPUAE law does not assign intellectual property to a client by default. Assign it expressly.
  5. Where it is really employment, use a permitPart-time or temporary permits exist precisely for these arrangements and cost far less than a reclassification.
The mistake people make. Long-term exclusive engagement of an individual as a contractor because it avoids visa costs. It works until the relationship ends, at which point the individual claims gratuity, notice and leave for the whole period — and the substance supports them.

Related

Questions

Only if they hold a permit or licence covering the work and the relationship is genuinely commercial. Otherwise it is unlicensed work or disguised employment.

Gratuity, notice and accrued leave become payable for the whole engagement, and the company faces permit-related penalties.

Not on its own. The substance of the relationship governs, not the label on the contract.

Not automatically the client. Intellectual property must be assigned expressly in the contract.

One question

How many people are on the payroll?